Quadro M500M vs Tesla M60
When comparing Quadro M500M and Tesla M60, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro M500M and Tesla M60 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M60
Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M500M | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 900% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
- Quadro M500M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro M500M.
- Quadro M500M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M500M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 472 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Quadro M500M and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 1008 MHz higher, than Quadro M500M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 587% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 812% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
Quadro M500M and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 1140% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 468% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 722% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 321% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 1400% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 660% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 14−16 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 837% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Quadro M500M. |
Full Specs
Quadro M500M | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GM108 | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 15 December 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4004 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |