Quadro P2000 Max Q vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between Quadro P2000 Max Q and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro P2000 Max Q will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M60
Quadro P2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
| Quadro P2000 Max Q | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro P2000 Max Q.
- Quadro P2000 Max Q is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Quadro P2000 Max Q is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 Max Q is 658 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Quadro P2000 Max Q is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 Max Q is 996 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3% more, than Quadro P2000 Max Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 7% more, than Quadro P2000 Max Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro P2000 Max Q and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| Quadro P2000 Max Q and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro P2000 Max Q and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| Quadro P2000 Max Q and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Quadro P2000 Max Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 3% more, than Quadro P2000 Max Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than Quadro P2000 Max Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Quadro P2000 Max Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 10% more, than Quadro P2000 Max Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| Quadro P2000 Max Q and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Quadro P2000 Max Q and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3% more, than Quadro P2000 Max Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3% more, than Quadro P2000 Max Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro P2000 Max Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro P2000 Max Q | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GP107GL | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 July 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |