Quadro P500 vs Tesla M60
When comparing Quadro P500 and Tesla M60, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro P500 and Tesla M60 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M60
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro P500 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P500 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P500 here:
Main Specs
Quadro P500 | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 900% more power consumption, than Quadro P500.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M60 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro P500.
- Quadro P500 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Quadro P500 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P500 is 898 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Quadro P500 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P500 and Tesla M60 is 5012 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 330% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 305% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 354% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 241% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 312% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 30−33 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 20−22 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 326% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Quadro P500. |
Full Specs
Quadro P500 | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP108 | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 14 November 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 256 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1519 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.0.1 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 6.1 | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |