Radeon HD 4810 vs Tesla M60
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon HD 4810 and Tesla M60. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon HD 4810 and Tesla M60. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon HD 4810
Tesla M60
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 4810 | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- Tesla M60 has 215% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4810.
- Radeon HD 4810 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4810 has 504 GB more memory, than Tesla M60.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 4810 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 68 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Tesla M60 is 21 mm longer, than Radeon HD 4810.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 1412 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4810.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon HD 4810 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| Radeon HD 4810 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 740% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 4810 | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | RV770 | GM204 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 28 May 2009 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 246 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |