Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between Radeon HD 4870 X2 and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 4870 X2 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4870 X2
Tesla M60
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 4870 X2 | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 286 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- Tesla M60 has 4% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 7 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 143 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Both graphics cards are the same length of 267 mm.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 1412 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 616% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 563% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 151% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 733% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 333% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 516% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 286% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 442% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 611% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 4870 X2 | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | R700 | GM204 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 August 2008 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 28.00 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 1,120.0 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |