Radeon HD 6970M vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between Radeon HD 6970M and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 6970M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M60
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon HD 6970M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 6970M | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 300% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6970M.
- Radeon HD 6970M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6970M.
- Radeon HD 6970M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 6970M is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 6970M is 123 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Radeon HD 6970M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 4112 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 245% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 230% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 49% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 233% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 165% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 214% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 136% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 171% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon HD 6970M. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 6970M | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | Terascale 2 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Blackcomb XT | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 6 January 2011 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 960 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 680 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,700 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.64 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,305.6 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 118 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |