Radeon Pro 560 vs Tesla M60
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon Pro 560 and Tesla M60, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon Pro 560 stacks up against Tesla M60, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M60
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 560 | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 300% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560.
- Radeon Pro 560 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 560.
- Radeon Pro 560 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 560 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 350 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 68 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 114% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon Pro 560 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon Pro 560 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 113% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Radeon Pro 560. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 560 | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 907 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 58.05 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |