Radeon Pro WX 4130 vs Tesla M60
When comparing Radeon Pro WX 4130 and Tesla M60, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro WX 4130 and Tesla M60 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M60
Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4130 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 4130.
- Radeon Pro WX 4130 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro WX 4130 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Radeon Pro WX 4130 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4130 is 1988 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 230% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 233% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 165% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 214% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 136% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 153% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 4130 | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Polaris | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 March 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |