Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Tesla M60
When choosing between Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Tesla M60, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Tesla M60.
Tesla M60
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4150 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 4150.
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4150 is 1988 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 258% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 265% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 316% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 202% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 266% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 312% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 192% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 276% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 11 | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 March 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |