Radeon R7 M270 vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between Radeon R7 M270 and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R7 M270 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M60
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
Radeon R7 M270 | Tesla M60 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | Not Listed | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M270 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R7 M270 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 M270 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270 is 268 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Radeon R7 M270 and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon R7 M270 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
Radeon R7 M270 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 740% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than Radeon R7 M270. |
Full Specs
Radeon R7 M270 | Tesla M60 | |
Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Opal XT / Mars | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 7 January 2014 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 557 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19.80 | 150.8 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |