Radeon R7 M370 vs Tesla M60
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon R7 M370 and Tesla M60, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon R7 M370 stacks up against Tesla M60, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M60
Radeon R7 M370 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M370 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M370 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 M370 | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M370 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M370.
- Radeon R7 M370 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 M370 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M370 is 318 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Radeon R7 M370 and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 4012 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 437% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 461% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 149% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 455% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 307% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 450% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 246% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 41% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 119% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 476% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Radeon R7 M370. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 M370 | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Litho | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 May 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 875 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 960 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 690 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.04 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 70 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |