Radeon R9 M365X vs Tesla M60
When choosing between Radeon R9 M365X and Tesla M60, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R9 M365X and Tesla M60.
Tesla M60
Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M365X | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M365X.
- Radeon R9 M365X is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M365X is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 343 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Radeon R9 M365X and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 3887 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 377% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 386% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 455% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 292% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 407% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 234% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 392% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M365X | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Tropo | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 May 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.00 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Check Price |