Radeon R9 M385 vs Tesla M60
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon R9 M385 and Tesla M60. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon R9 M385 and Tesla M60. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M60
Radeon R9 M385 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M385 | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M385.
- Radeon R9 M385 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M385 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Radeon R9 M385 and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 3512 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 245% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 233% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 171% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 247% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 136% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 192% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 255% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M385 | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Strato | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 56.00 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |