Radeon R9 M390X vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between Radeon R9 M390X and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 M390X will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M60
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M390X | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Radeon R9 M390X is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M390X is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M390X is 166 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Radeon R9 M390X and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 65% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 70% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R9 M390X and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon R9 M390X and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 67% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 54% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 63% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 82% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 75% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 68% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M390X | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Amethyst (XT) / Tonga | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 9 June 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |