Radeon R9 M395X vs Tesla M60
When choosing between Radeon R9 M395X and Tesla M60, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R9 M395X and Tesla M60.
Tesla M60
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M395X | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M60 has 20% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- Radeon R9 M395X is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M395X is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395X is 166 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Radeon R9 M395X and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 3762 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 56% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R9 M395X and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon R9 M395X and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 51% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 63% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 52% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M395X | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Amethyst XT | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2014 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |