Tesla C2050 vs Tesla M60
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Tesla C2050 and Tesla M60, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Tesla C2050 stacks up against Tesla M60, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2050
Tesla M60
Main Specs
| Tesla C2050 | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
- Tesla M60 has 26% more power consumption, than Tesla C2050.
- Tesla C2050 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M60 has 5 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Tesla C2050 is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 17 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Tesla C2050 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Tesla M60 is 19 mm longer, than Tesla C2050.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 2012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 106% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 114% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Tesla C2050 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Tesla C2050 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 90% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 113% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
Full Specs
| Tesla C2050 | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GF100 | GM204 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 25 July 2011 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 448 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | 432 Mh/s |