Tesla M60 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Tesla M60 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Tesla M60 stacks up against Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M60
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Tesla M60 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Tesla M60 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- Tesla M60 is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Tesla M60 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 171% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 186% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Tesla M60 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 55% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Tesla M60 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 177% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 127% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 153% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 112% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 178% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 178% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | − | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. |
Full Specs
Tesla M60 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GM204 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Tesla M60 vs GeForce GTX 980M
- Tesla M60 vs Quadro P2000
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 980M
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro P2000
- Tesla M60 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tesla M60 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100