FirePro M5950 vs Tesla T4
When choosing between FirePro M5950 and Tesla T4, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5950 and Tesla T4.
Tesla T4
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 100% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 15 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 140 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 9100 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 485% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| FirePro M5950 and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 116% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 335% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 272% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 400% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Turing |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | TU104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |