GeForce 930M vs Tesla T4
In this comparison between GeForce 930M and Tesla T4 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 930M will be the best choice, for others Tesla T4 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla T4
GeForce 930M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 930M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 930M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 930M | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 112% more power consumption, than GeForce 930M.
- GeForce 930M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than GeForce 930M.
- GeForce 930M is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 930M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 930M is 343 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- GeForce 930M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 8200 MHz higher, than GeForce 930M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 930M and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 44% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce 930M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 930M | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
| Code name | N16S-GM-B/S, N16S-LP | TU104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2015 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 928 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 941 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Transistor count | 13,600 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.58 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 722.7 gflops | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 7.5 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 84 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |