GeForce GT 645M vs Tesla T4
When choosing between GeForce GT 645M and Tesla T4, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 645M and Tesla T4.
Tesla T4
GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 645M | Tesla T4 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 70 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 118% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 645M.
- GeForce GT 645M is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 645M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- GeForce GT 645M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 8200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 645M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 645M and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce GT 645M and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 150% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 526% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GeForce GT 645M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 645M | Tesla T4 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
Code name | N13P-GS | TU104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 13 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 585 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.7 billion/sec | 254.4 |
Floating-point performance | 544.5 gflops | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 7.5 |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 19 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro CX
- Tesla T4 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Tesla T4 vs Quadro CX
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon RX Vega M GL 870
- Tesla T4 vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
- Tesla T4 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL 870