GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Tesla T4
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla T4 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Ti will be the best choice, for others Tesla T4 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Tesla T4
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 7% more power consumption, than Tesla T4.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla T4 are build with Turing architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 945 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla T4 are manufactured by 12 nm process technology.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 61 mm longer, than Tesla T4.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 2000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than Tesla T4. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than Tesla T4. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Tesla T4. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than Tesla T4. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 7% more, than Tesla T4. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Tesla T4. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Tesla T4. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Tesla T4. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Tesla T4. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 8% more, than Tesla T4. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla T4. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU117 | TU104 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | no data | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 254.4 | |
| Length | 229 mm | 168 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320.0 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |