GeForce GTX 460M vs Tesla T4
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460M and Tesla T4 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460M will be the best choice, for others Tesla T4 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla T4
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460M | Tesla T4 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 70 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 40% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- GeForce GTX 460M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1520 GB more memory, than Tesla T4.
- GeForce GTX 460M is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 765 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 8750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 571% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 655% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 188% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 816% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 357% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 620% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 711% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460M | Tesla T4 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Turing |
Code name | N11E-GS | TU104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 September 2010 | 13 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 192 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 585 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion/sec | 254.4 |
Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 7.5 |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 33 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |