GeForce GTX 470M vs Tesla T4
When choosing between GeForce GTX 470M and Tesla T4, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 470M and Tesla T4.
Tesla T4
GeForce GTX 470M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 470M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 470M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 470M | Tesla T4 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 70 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 470M has 7% more power consumption, than Tesla T4.
- GeForce GTX 470M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 470M has 1520 GB more memory, than Tesla T4.
- GeForce GTX 470M is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 470M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 470M is 515 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- GeForce GTX 470M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 8750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 470M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 470M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 470M | Tesla T4 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Turing |
Code name | N11E-GT | TU104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 November 2010 | 13 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 288 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 585 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19.7 billion/sec | 254.4 |
Floating-point performance | 616.3 gflops | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 7.5 |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |