GeForce GTX 870M vs Tesla T4
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 870M and Tesla T4, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 870M stacks up against Tesla T4, check out specs charts below.
Tesla T4
GeForce GTX 870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 870M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 870M | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 870M has 42% more power consumption, than Tesla T4.
- GeForce GTX 870M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 10 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 870M.
- GeForce GTX 870M is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 870M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 870M is 356 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- GeForce GTX 870M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 870M and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTX 870M and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 870M | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Code name | N15P-GT | TU104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2014 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 108.3 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 7.5 |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |