Iris Graphics 6100 vs Tesla T4
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Graphics 6100 and Tesla T4. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Graphics 6100 and Tesla T4. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla T4
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 366% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Tesla T4 is 285 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 201% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 571% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 363% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 46% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 563% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Turing |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | TU104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 254.4 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 320.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |