Quadro 3000M vs Tesla T4
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro 3000M and Tesla T4. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro 3000M and Tesla T4. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla T4
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 3000M has 7% more power consumption, than Tesla T4.
- Quadro 3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 3000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Tesla T4 is 135 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- Quadro 3000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 9375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 3000M and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 3000M | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Turing |
| Code name | Fermi | TU104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.00 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 7.5 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |