Radeon HD 4810 vs Tesla T4
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon HD 4810 and Tesla T4, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon HD 4810 stacks up against Tesla T4, check out specs charts below.
Radeon HD 4810
Tesla T4
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 4810 | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- Radeon HD 4810 has 35% more power consumption, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon HD 4810 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4810 has 496 GB more memory, than Tesla T4.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 4810 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 40 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Radeon HD 4810 is 78 mm longer, than Tesla T4.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 6400 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4810.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon HD 4810 and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| Radeon HD 4810 and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 740% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 4810 | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Turing |
| Code name | RV770 | TU104 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 28 May 2009 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | |
| Length | 246 mm | 168 mm |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |