Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Tesla T4
In this comparison between Radeon HD 4870 X2 and Tesla T4 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 4870 X2 will be the best choice, for others Tesla T4 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4870 X2
Tesla T4
Main Specs
Radeon HD 4870 X2 | Tesla T4 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 286 Watt | 70 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 has 308% more power consumption, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 15 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 115 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 99 mm longer, than Tesla T4.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 6400 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 151% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 314% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 20−22 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 4870 X2 | Tesla T4 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Turing |
Code name | R700 | TU104 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 August 2008 | 13 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 800 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 585 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 28.00 | 254.4 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,120.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |