Radeon HD 6990M vs Tesla T4
When comparing Radeon HD 6990M and Tesla T4, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon HD 6990M and Tesla T4 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla T4
Radeon HD 6990M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6990M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6990M here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 6990M | Tesla T4 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 70 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 6990M has 42% more power consumption, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon HD 6990M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6990M.
- Radeon HD 6990M is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 6990M is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 6990M is 130 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon HD 6990M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 9100 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6990M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 157% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 107% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon HD 6990M. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 6990M | Tesla T4 | |
Architecture | Terascale 2 | Turing |
Code name | Blackcomb XTX | TU104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 July 2011 | 13 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 1120 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 585 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,700 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.04 | 254.4 |
Floating-point performance | 1,601.6 gflops | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |