Radeon HD 7850M vs Tesla T4
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon HD 7850M and Tesla T4. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon HD 7850M and Tesla T4. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla T4
Radeon HD 7850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7850M here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 7850M | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 75% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7850M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7850M.
- Radeon HD 7850M is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 7850M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7850M is 90 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon HD 7850M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 6000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7850M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 412% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 292% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 364% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 232% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 41% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 119% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 344% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 461% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 45% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 7850M | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Turing |
| Code name | Heathrow Pro | TU104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 24 April 2012 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.00 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |