Radeon HD 7870M vs Tesla T4
In this comparison between Radeon HD 7870M and Tesla T4 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 7870M will be the best choice, for others Tesla T4 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla T4
Radeon HD 7870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7870M here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 7870M | Tesla T4 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 70 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 55% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7870M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7870M.
- Radeon HD 7870M is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 7870M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7870M is 215 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon HD 7870M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 6000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7870M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 139% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 277% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 7870M | Tesla T4 | |
Architecture | GCN | Turing |
Code name | Heathrow XT | TU104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 24 April 2012 | 13 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 640 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 585 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 254.4 |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |