Radeon Pro 450 vs Tesla T4
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon Pro 450 and Tesla T4, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon Pro 450 stacks up against Tesla T4, check out specs charts below.
Tesla T4
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon Pro 450 | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Radeon Pro 450 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Radeon Pro 450 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 450 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 215 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 4920 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 450.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 123% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 152% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon Pro 450 | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Turing |
| Code name | Polaris 11 | TU104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 October 2016 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |