Radeon R9 M280X vs Tesla T4
When comparing Radeon R9 M280X and Tesla T4, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R9 M280X and Tesla T4 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla T4
Radeon R9 M280X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M280X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M280X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M280X | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | Not Listed | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M280X is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M280X is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M280X is 315 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon R9 M280X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 655% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R9 M280X and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| Radeon R9 M280X and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 411% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 544% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 272% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 471% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M280X | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Turing |
| Code name | Saturn XT | TU104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 February 2015 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 61.60 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | Not Listed | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |