Radeon R9 M395X vs Tesla T4
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon R9 M395X and Tesla T4, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon R9 M395X stacks up against Tesla T4, check out specs charts below.
Tesla T4
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M395X | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 257% more power consumption, than Tesla T4.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla T4 has 12 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- Radeon R9 M395X is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M395X is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395X is 138 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 8750 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R9 M395X and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon R9 M395X and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 35% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M395X | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Turing |
| Code name | Amethyst XT | TU104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2014 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |