Radeon R9 M485X vs Tesla T4
In this comparison between Radeon R9 M485X and Tesla T4 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 M485X will be the best choice, for others Tesla T4 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla T4
Radeon R9 M485X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M485X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M485X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M485X | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB MB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M485X has 257% more power consumption, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon R9 M485X is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 8 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M485X.
- Radeon R9 M485X is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M485X is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M485X is 138 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 5000 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M485X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R9 M485X and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon R9 M485X and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M485X | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Turing |
| Code name | Amethyst | TU104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 14 May 2016 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |