FirePro M4150 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4150 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4150 stacks up against Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, check out specs charts below.

FirePro M4150

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro M4150	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	12−14	30−33
medium / 1080p	3−4	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	14−16	45−50
medium / 1080p	6−7	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	120−130	200−210
medium / 768p	90−95	170−180
ultra / 1080p	35−40	90−95
QHD / 1440p	21−24	50−55
4K / 2160p	16−18	24−27
high / 768p	65−70	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 18% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	45−50	90−95
ultra / 1080p	20−22	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 87% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	2−3	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	2−3	5−6
low / 720p	10−12	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	10−11	21−24
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	3−4	12−14
low / 720p	50−55	95−100
medium / 1080p	10−12	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 150% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	5−6	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	3−4	6−7
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	8−9	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 211% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	45−50	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	4−5	27−30
ultra / 1080p	2−3	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 122% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	1−2	8−9
ultra / 1080p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	4−5	27−30
medium / 1080p	3−4	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 433% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	85−90	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 28% more, than FirePro M4150.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	9−10	50−55
medium / 768p	8−9	30−35
high / 1080p	4−5	16−18
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−11
4K / 2160p	1−2	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 360% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	30−35
high / 768p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than FirePro M4150.

Full Specs

	FirePro M4150	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	Opal	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	16 October 2013	15 August 2020
Pipelines	384	96
Core clock speed	715 MHz
Transistor count	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	17.16
Floating-point performance	549.1 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_1)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

FirePro M4150 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares