FirePro M6000 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M6000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M6000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M6000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M6000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 or Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6000
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
43 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
FirePro M6000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
20−22
30−33
medium / 1080p
10−12
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 54% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 47% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
150−160
200−210
medium / 768p
120−130
170−180
ultra / 1080p
65−70
90−95
QHD / 1440p
35−40
50−55
4K / 2160p
27−30
24−27
high / 768p
95−100
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
medium / 768p
65−70
90−95
ultra / 1080p
40−45
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
14−16
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
low / 720p
70−75
95−100
medium / 1080p
30−33
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 42% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
50−55
medium / 1080p
16−18
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
60−65
80−85
medium / 768p
50−55
70−75
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 41% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
6−7
8−9
ultra / 1080p
4−5
6−7
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
27−30
medium / 1080p
8−9
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
100−110
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 14% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than FirePro M6000.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
27−30
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
30−35
50−55
medium / 768p
21−24
30−35
high / 1080p
10−12
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
4K / 2160p
6−7
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 43% more, than FirePro M6000.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
high / 768p
40−45
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than FirePro M6000.
Full Specs
FirePro M6000
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
GCN
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Heathrow
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 July 2012
15 August 2020
Pipelines
640
96
Core clock speed
750 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
32.00
Floating-point performance
1,024 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
Bus support
n/a
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Form factor
MXM-B
StereoOutput3D
+
Check Price
Check Price