FirePro S9000 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
When choosing between FirePro S9000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
FirePro S9000
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 55% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S9000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 117% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 169% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Tahiti | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M295X
- FirePro S9000 vs P106 100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon R9 M295X
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs P106 100
- FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 950
- FirePro S9000 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100