FirePro V5800 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro V5800
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 112% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 60% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 63% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 80% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 71% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 21% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 42% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 88% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 115% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Juniper | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 800 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R7 M370
- FirePro V5800 vs Quadro K2100M
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon R7 M370
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro K2100M
- FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 950
- FirePro V5800 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100