FireStream 9370 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
When choosing between FireStream 9370 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9370 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
FireStream 9370
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 7% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
FireStream 9370 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
FireStream 9370 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
FireStream 9370 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Cypress | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 950
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100