GeForce 920A vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between GeForce 920A and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 920A will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 920A
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920A | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3000% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 920A and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce 920A and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 340% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce 920A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920A | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GK208B | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | |
Transistor count | 915 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.5 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 920A vs Quadro 2000
- GeForce 920A vs GRID K220Q
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro 2000
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GRID K220Q
- GeForce 920A vs GeForce GTX 950
- GeForce 920A vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100