GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GF114 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 336 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 950
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100