GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
When choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
3−4
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
30−33
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 21% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
27−30
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
QHD / 1440p
6−7
1−2
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
55−60
45−50
medium / 1080p
30−33
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
200−210
medium / 768p
180−190
170−180
ultra / 1080p
100−110
90−95
QHD / 1440p
60−65
50−55
4K / 2160p
30−35
24−27
high / 768p
150−160
130−140
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
90−95
ultra / 1080p
70−75
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
5−6
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
27−30
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
QHD / 1440p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
100−110
95−100
medium / 1080p
60−65
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Fortnite is 15% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
27−30
24−27
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
QHD / 1440p
10−11
6−7
low / 720p
55−60
50−55
medium / 1080p
30−35
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
90−95
80−85
medium / 768p
80−85
70−75
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
QHD / 1440p
3−4
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
10−11
8−9
ultra / 1080p
8−9
6−7
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
110−120
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
60−65
50−55
medium / 768p
35−40
30−35
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
4K / 2160p
6−7
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
30−35
high / 768p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
GK106
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
26 March 2013
15 August 2020
Pipelines
768
96
Core clock speed
980 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
