GRID K240Q vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K240Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K240Q stacks up against Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, check out specs charts below.

GRID K240Q

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K240Q	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	12−14
ultra / 1080p	6−7	7−8
QHD / 1440p	1−2	1−2
low / 720p	21−24	30−33
medium / 1080p	12−14	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	170−180	200−210
medium / 768p	140−150	170−180
ultra / 1080p	75−80	90−95
QHD / 1440p	40−45	50−55
4K / 2160p	30−33	24−27
high / 768p	110−120	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 18% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	95−100	110−120
medium / 768p	75−80	90−95
ultra / 1080p	45−50	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−12	14−16
4K / 2160p	4−5	5−6
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	12−14	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	12−14
low / 720p	75−80	95−100
medium / 1080p	35−40	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 27% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	24−27
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
QHD / 1440p	4−5	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	50−55
medium / 1080p	21−24	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 36% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	65−70	80−85
medium / 768p	60−65	70−75
high / 1080p	20−22	27−30
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	7−8	8−9
ultra / 1080p	5−6	6−7
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	27−30
medium / 1080p	9−10	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	90−95	100−110
medium / 1080p	100−105	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	55−60
medium / 1080p	20−22	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	27−30
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 23% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	35−40	50−55
medium / 768p	24−27	30−35
high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
4K / 2160p	7−8	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	30−35
high / 768p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GRID K240Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K240Q	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	GK104	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	15 August 2020
Pipelines	1536	96
Core clock speed	745 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K240Q vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares