GRID K260Q vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

When choosing between GRID K260Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K260Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.

GRID K260Q

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	7−8
QHD / 1440p	3−4	1−2
low / 720p	30−35	30−33
medium / 1080p	18−20	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 7% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
QHD / 1440p	7−8	1−2
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	45−50
medium / 1080p	27−30	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	210−220	200−210
medium / 768p	180−190	170−180
ultra / 1080p	95−100	90−95
QHD / 1440p	50−55	50−55
4K / 2160p	30−33	24−27
high / 768p	140−150	130−140
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	90−95	90−95
ultra / 1080p	60−65	60−65
GRID K260Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
4K / 2160p	6−7	5−6
low / 720p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	18−20	18−20
QHD / 1440p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	95−100	95−100
medium / 1080p	50−55	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 5% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	24−27	24−27
ultra / 1080p	20−22	18−20
QHD / 1440p	9−10	6−7
low / 720p	50−55	50−55
medium / 1080p	27−30	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 3% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	85−90	80−85
medium / 768p	75−80	70−75
high / 1080p	30−33	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−12
QHD / 1440p	3−4	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	9−10	8−9
ultra / 1080p	7−8	6−7
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	27−30
medium / 1080p	12−14	12−14
GRID K260Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	100−110
medium / 1080p	100−110	100−110
GRID K260Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	55−60
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
high / 1080p	14−16	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	27−30
medium / 1080p	16−18	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	55−60	50−55
medium / 768p	30−35	30−35
high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−12	10−11
4K / 2160p	8−9	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 8% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	30−35
high / 768p	50−55	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	GK104	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	15 August 2020
Pipelines	1536	96
Core clock speed	745 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K260Q vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares