GRID K280Q vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between GRID K280Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K280Q will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K280Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
GRID K280Q | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 14% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 27% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 5% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 15% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GRID K280Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K280Q | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GK104 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID K280Q vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GRID K280Q vs Quadro K3100M
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro K3100M
- GRID K280Q vs GeForce GTX 950
- GRID K280Q vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100