GRID M10 8Q vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
When choosing between GRID M10 8Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M10 8Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.
GRID M10 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID M10 8Q is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 7% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
GRID M10 8Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
GRID M10 8Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 2% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 2% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
GRID M10 8Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4% more, than GRID M10 8Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
GRID M10 8Q and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GRID M10 8Q | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GM107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 18 May 2016 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID M10 8Q vs GeForce GTX 950M
- GRID M10 8Q vs GeForce GTX 850M
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950M
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 850M
- GRID M10 8Q vs GeForce GTX 950
- GRID M10 8Q vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100