Quadro 2000M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

When choosing between Quadro 2000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 2000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7.

Quadro 2000M Check Price

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Quadro 2000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro 2000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M or Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:

Quadro 2000M Laptops

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type	DDR3	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	1−2	30−33
medium / 1080p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3000% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro 2000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	200−210
medium / 768p	27−30	170−180
ultra / 1080p	7−8	90−95
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
high / 768p	16−18	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
Quadro 2000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	90−95
ultra / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	12−14
low / 720p	21−24	95−100
medium / 1080p	0−1	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 340% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	50−55
medium / 1080p	0−1	27−30
low / 768p	18−20	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	55−60
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	0−1	50−55
medium / 768p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−35
high / 768p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Quadro 2000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	Fermi	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	Fermi	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	22 February 2011	15 August 2020
Pipelines	192	96
Core clock speed	550 MHz
Transistor count	1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	17.60
Floating-point performance	422.4 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.1
Vulkan	N/A
CUDA	2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	27 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
Quick Sync		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 2000M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Quadro 2000M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares