Quadro 500M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

When comparing Quadro 500M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 500M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Quadro 500M

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro 500M	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type	DDR3	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

Quadro 500M is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
Quadro 500M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Quadro 500M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	1−2	30−33
medium / 1080p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3000% more, than Quadro 500M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro 500M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	200−210
medium / 768p	27−30	170−180
ultra / 1080p	7−8	90−95
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
high / 768p	16−18	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than Quadro 500M.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
Quadro 500M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	90−95
ultra / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Quadro 500M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	12−14
low / 720p	21−24	95−100
medium / 1080p	0−1	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 340% more, than Quadro 500M.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	50−55
medium / 1080p	0−1	27−30
low / 768p	18−20	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than Quadro 500M.
high / 1080p	−	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro 500M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	55−60
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Quadro 500M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	0−1	50−55
medium / 768p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−35
high / 768p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Quadro 500M.

Full Specs

	Quadro 500M	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	Fermi	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	GF108	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	22 February 2011	15 August 2020
Pipelines	96	96
Core clock speed	700 MHz
Transistor count	585 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	11.20
Floating-point performance	268.8 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.1
Vulkan	N/A
CUDA	2.1
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

Quadro 500M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares