Quadro 7000 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
When comparing Quadro 7000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 7000 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 7000
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 7000 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 204 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- Quadro 7000 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Quadro 7000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Battlefield 5 is 34% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 20% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. |
Full Specs
Quadro 7000 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GF110 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 2 May 2012 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 512 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 651 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 41.66 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 163.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro 7000 vs Quadro M2000M
- Quadro 7000 vs Tesla M10
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro M2000M
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Tesla M10
- Quadro 7000 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Quadro 7000 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100